First of all, if information is agreed to have been accurately reported, what is the basis for your dispute? Are you just fishing, or do you have a legitimate issue of accuracy of their reporting?
As for a direct dispute under section 623(a)(8), if the information asserted to be inaccurate has already been investigated, either by way of dispute through the CRAs or by a prior direct dispute, the furnisher can summarily dismiss the new dispute without any new investigation as being "substantially the same" as a prior dispute, and thus "frivolous or irrelevant." 16 CFR 660.4(f)(ii). Once verified, they dont have to investigate again.
Asking the CRA to provide their "method of verification' of a prior dispute resolution will provide you with the parties they contacted during their verification process. Would that be helpful in showing they did not properly investigate your dispute?
As for the charge-off, I am a bit confused. A charge-off does not relieve the consumer of the debt, so I dont understand the OC's comment that, because they did a charge-off, there is no debt. Apparently, they have additionally sold the debt, in which case they cannot accept payment. You would have to deal with the current owner.
It appears that you have legitimate credit reporting, and that earlier deletion would be properly addressed by way of requests for good-will deletion. Other than that, you will just have to wait for the normal CR exclusion periods to expire.
|