Go Back   Credit Forum > Credit Repair

Reply
 
Thread Tools
 
#1
 
Old 09-02-2011, 11:00 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 82
Nixer is on a distinguished road
Default re-investigation

Back after a couple years and trying to improve the score more. I ended up hitting dead ends with too many verifieds and will not re-investigate. I am wondering how long I need to or should wait before sending them new disputes. It's been almost 2 years so I am thinking I should be good to go. Does anyone know?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
 
#2
 
Old 09-02-2011, 08:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 502
Lian is on a distinguished road
Default

Once a party who reported disputed information has conducted an investigation of your dispute of the accuracy of their reporting, they can dismiss any subsequent dispute regarding its accuracy as being "frivolous or irrelevant" without any renewed investigation of the dispute unless the new dispute includes substantially new facts or documentation. The FCRA essentially says that they don't have to conduct repeated investigations once they have completed one. FCRA 611(a)(3) and 623(a)(8)(F).

The ability to dismiss a dispute as frivolous or irrelevant based on substantially the same information as a dispute previously submitted does not have an associated time period.

You can make your renewed dispute and hope that they don't rely on their rights to dismiss it. That I cant predict. However, they have the right to do so, without regard to passage of time from the earlier dispute.
Reply With Quote
 
#3
 
Old 09-06-2011, 04:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Hal Jordan is on a distinguished road
Default

If it were me I would send new disputes (especially after two years). And if those come back as verified also I'd contact them requesting the MOV and see if I could get them to reopen based off of that. I'd also consider filing a 623 if they came back verified again.
Reply With Quote
 
#4
 
Old 09-06-2011, 08:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 502
Lian is on a distinguished road
Default

The implementing rules for the direct dispute process state, at 16 CFR 660.4(f)(ii):

"A furnisher is not required to investigate a direct dispute if the furnisher has reasonably determined that the dispute is frivolous or irrelevant. A dispute is frivolous or irrelevant if: ...

"(ii) The direct dispute is substantially the same as a dispute previously submitted by or on behalf of the consumer, either directly to the furnisher or through a consumer reporting agency, with respect to which the furnisher has already satisfied the applicable requirements of the Act or this section; provided however that a direct dispute is not the same as a dispute previously submitted if the dispute includes information listed paragraph (d) of this section that was not previously provided to the furnisher;"

You can now file a direct dispute, but unless specific new information and supporting documentation of the form set forth in section 660.4(d) is provided, they have the authority to dismiss it without investigation.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
623 investigation wdsman1 Credit Repair 4 03-14-2011 01:55 AM
re-investigation time limit Nixer Credit Repair 16 04-29-2009 08:52 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.