Quote:
Originally Posted by Trish  For restrictive endorsements, it is preferable that your state allows them. That's where it will be enforced but you'll also want to check to see if it's allowed in the OC/CA's state. Even though you'll be enforcing it in your state, there is no guarantee they won't fight it if their state doesn't allow it. |
SO this is the definition in Michigan
Sec. 1207.
(1) A party who with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice”, “under protest” or the like are sufficient.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an accord and satisfaction.
History: 1962, Act 174, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964 ;-- Am. 1993, Act 130, Eff. Sept. 30, 1993
© 2009 Legislative Council, State of Michigan
So does this mean that accords and satisfactions are not enforcible even if they write Under protest on the check?
Thanks for your help.